FLights

So the way you guys are thinking, in Sailwave a flight is *always* a
race-specific allocation; i.e. whenever you talk about a competitor's
flight, there is always an implicit race associated with it (even if it's
the same for all races).

And when users run Topper Nationwide type events, they assign the same
flight to all races. I can then then remove the "default" flight field stop
confusion. It also stops confusion in start expressions.

Sounds OK to me if that's what users want.

I would probably add a tab to Edit+Competitor called "Flights" (plural) and
give a list for race 1 to N (directly editable) with a note that they can be
set by hand from here, or, by using the flight allocation tool.

Colin
www.sailwave.com

···

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.24/100 - Release Date: 13/09/2005

HI!

I do hope that what is clearyfied here, applies to all “Flights Users”.

After this, it looks to me that all flights kind of racing are basicly the same. Because of this, maybe Colin can make it easy to use!

Regards,

Martin

···

----- Original Message -----

From:
Colin Jenkins

To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:02 AM

Subject: [sailwave] FLights

` So the way you guys are thinking, in Sailwave a flight is always a
race-specific allocation; i.e. whenever you talk about a competitor’s
flight, there is always an implicit race associated with it (even if it’s
the same for all races).

And when users run Topper Nationwide type events, they assign the same
flight to all races. I can then then remove the “default” flight field stop
confusion. It also stops confusion in start expressions.

Sounds OK to me if that’s what users want.

I would probably add a tab to Edit+Competitor called “Flights” (plural) and
give a list for race 1 to N (directly editable) with a note that they can be
set by hand from here, or, by using the flight allocation tool.

Colin
www.sailwave.com


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.24/100 - Release Date: 13/09/2005

`

Hi

Before we go any further, I would like to just consider terminology.

Since the very early days when someone asked Colin to score flights in an elimination series (prize goes to Mark Townsend ;-))

we have used the term flights to describe what we have now.

Many of you will be aware that flights is also used in Team and Match racing, with different meanings (although there are many similarities)

I must admit, there are times when I have to stop & think & put my fleet racing head on instead of Match or Team racing & I can see the possibility of even further confusion/misunderstanding occurring when Sailwave gets outside our group of users eg International Race Officers writing SIs.

To try & determine some level of consistency, I had another look at AddC which says

The sailing instructions below provide for dividing a large fleet into smaller fleets for a series of qualifying races, the results of which determine each boat’s assignment to two or more fleets for the final series

Logic therefore is to follow the lead of ISAF & not cause confusion with the team & match racers

NO! NO! NO! I hear you all calling, as we use the term fleet to mean something different - but do we???

In the days when Mark sent in his request, fleet was a very important term as it enable groups of boats to be scored independently of other groups & was therefore a major scoring mechanism.

Now that we are nearing a new major public release with the fleet scoring tool long consigned to history, and replaced with separate start options, user defined scoring systems & multiple 1sts etc, perhaps now is the right time to think about terminology.

I believe that the right way to go is to follow the rules of our sport so what are the differences between fleet (as we knew it) and flight (as we now use it)?

Both are identities of groups of boats which may race in the same start or separate starts

Contrary to Team & Match Racing, the groups are always competing in the same race number, when they start just differs

Both need the facility for the groups to be scored separately at some point in the series

The new facilities which Colin has developed are really just allowing us to change the group which a boat sails in (I think!)

I agree with Martin that displaying the CURRENT group would be the icing on the cake as it would eliminate the hassle of populating a column for the finals so that they can be scored separately

IS IT REALLY AS SIMPLE AS THAT???

If so, then we should think seriously about going back to the term ‘Fleet’ with ‘Fleet’ re-assignment & ‘Fleet’ seeding tools.

If it is a Traditional (instead of AddC) fleet racing series, the user just ignores the special tool (could it be called the AddC tool?)

PS Colin tends to use App LE to describe this type of racing but Appendix LE is mainly about large, complicated multi-class fleets, which is why I always tend to use AddC (Addendum C of Appendix LE) which deals specifically with this type of racing

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD??

I have written separately to Colin to identify that attempts to become more media friendly with Grand Finals etc, have not been totally successful & there could be changes the the system after ISAF conference in November.

If anyone hears of changes to AddC or whatever, please circulate it through SUG

My own view is that I believe there should be a type of racing with heats, semis & finals with all boats racing on the last day, but that’s for another day ;-))

Regards

Ralph

···

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Bølgen [mailto:martin@seilforening.no]
Sent: 14 September 2005 12:39
To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [sailwave] FLights

HI!

I do hope that what is clearyfied here, applies to all “Flights Users”.

After this, it looks to me that all flights kind of racing are basicly the same. Because of this, maybe Colin can make it easy to use!

Regards,

Martin

----- Original Message -----

From:
Colin Jenkins

To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:02 AM

Subject: [sailwave] FLights

` So the way you guys are thinking, in Sailwave a flight is always a
race-specific allocation; i.e. whenever you talk about a competitor’s
flight, there is always an implicit race associated with it (even if it’s
the same for all races).

And when users run Topper Nationwide type events, they assign the same
flight to all races.  I can then then remove the "default" flight field stop
confusion.  It also stops confusion in start expressions.

Sounds OK to me if that's what users want.

I would probably add a tab to Edit+Competitor called "Flights" (plural) and
give a list for race 1 to N (directly editable) with a note that they can be
set by hand from here, or, by using the flight allocation tool.

Colin
www.sailwave.com


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.24/100 - Release Date: 13/09/2005

`

Hi Ralph,

“Is it as simple as that?” Yes. You can score a AddC event using Sailwave version 1.00 if you turn off race tie breaking and enter the results by hand - by hand meaning not using the sailno wiz (which will not know about multiple firsts etc) and using edit+result - i.e. double-clicking on a result cell and enter the multiple firsts etc by hand. You do of course have to manually work out who is in the next days flight assignments, but it can be done.

All the developments do is allow you to use the sailno wiz (because of the ‘allow multiple firsts etc across N starts’ check box) and do the flight rotations. Plus some other twiddly stuff (discards/tie-breaking) that is not really important.

On field names, it is complictatd by the fact that in the USA our fleets tend to be their divisions… Hence why I try (and fail) and not have fields for specific purposes…

You’ll hate this but one way out of the confusion is to cause more confusion and allow every field to have a race specific value… Not just flights and ratings - then you can use any field you like for AddC… and Sailwave truely become a generic tool. That nobody will understand but ‘mathematically’ it’ll be neat… :slight_smile:

Colin

www.sailwave.com

···

-----Original Message-----
From: sailwave@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sailwave@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Ralph Tingle
Sent: 14 September 2005 18:08
To:
sailwave@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [sailwave] Flights

Hi

Before we go any further, I would like to just consider terminology.

Since the very early days when someone asked Colin to score flights in an elimination series (prize goes to Mark Townsend ;-))

we have used the term flights to describe what we have now.

Many of you will be aware that flights is also used in Team and Match racing, with different meanings (although there are many similarities)

I must admit, there are times when I have to stop & think & put my fleet racing head on instead of Match or Team racing & I can see the possibility of even further confusion/misunderstanding occurring when Sailwave gets outside our group of users eg International Race Officers writing SIs.

To try & determine some level of consistency, I had another look at AddC which says

  • The sailing instructions below provide for dividing a large fleet into smaller fleets for a series of qualifying races, the results of which determine each boat’s assignment to two or more fleets for the final series*

Logic therefore is to follow the lead of ISAF & not cause confusion with the team & match racers

NO! NO! NO! I hear you all calling, as we use the term fleet to mean something different - but do we???

In the days when Mark sent in his request, fleet was a very important term as it enable groups of boats to be scored independently of other groups & was therefore a major scoring mechanism.

Now that we are nearing a new major public release with the fleet scoring tool long consigned to history, and replaced with separate start options, user defined scoring systems & multiple 1sts etc, perhaps now is the right time to think about terminology.

I believe that the right way to go is to follow the rules of our sport so what are the differences between fleet (as we knew it) and flight (as we now use it)?

Both are identities of groups of boats which may race in the same start or separate starts

Contrary to Team & Match Racing, the groups are always competing in the same race number, when they start just differs

Both need the facility for the groups to be scored separately at some point in the series

The new facilities which Colin has developed are really just allowing us to change the group which a boat sails in (I think!)

I agree with Martin that displaying the CURRENT group would be the icing on the cake as it would eliminate the hassle of populating a column for the finals so that they can be scored separately

IS IT REALLY AS SIMPLE AS THAT???

If so, then we should think seriously about going back to the term ‘Fleet’ with ‘Fleet’ re-assignment & ‘Fleet’ seeding tools.

If it is a Traditional (instead of AddC) fleet racing series, the user just ignores the special tool (could it be called the AddC tool?)

PS Colin tends to use App LE to describe this type of racing but Appendix LE is mainly about large, complicated multi-class fleets, which is why I always tend to use AddC (Addendum C of Appendix LE) which deals specifically with this type of racing

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD??

I have written separately to Colin to identify that attempts to become more media friendly with Grand Finals etc, have not been totally successful & there could be changes the the system after ISAF conference in November.

If anyone hears of changes to AddC or whatever, please circulate it through SUG

My own view is that I believe there should be a type of racing with heats, semis & finals with all boats racing on the last day, but that’s for another day ;-))

Regards

Ralph

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Bølgen [mailto:martin@seilforening.no]
Sent: 14 September 2005 12:39
To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [sailwave] FLights

HI!

I do hope that what is clearyfied here, applies to all "Flights Users".
After this, it looks to me that all flights kind of racing are basicly the same. Because of this, maybe Colin can make it easy to use!

Regards,

Martin

----- Original Message -----

From:
Colin Jenkins

To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:02 AM

Subject: [sailwave] FLights

` So the way you guys are thinking, in Sailwave a flight is always a
race-specific allocation; i.e. whenever you talk about a competitor’s
flight, there is always an implicit race associated with it (even if it’s
the same for all races).

  And when users run Topper Nationwide type events, they assign the same
  flight to all races.  I can then then remove the "default" flight field stop
  confusion.  It also stops confusion in start expressions.

Sounds OK to me if that’s what users want.

  I would probably add a tab to Edit+Competitor called "Flights" (plural) and
  give a list for race 1 to N (directly editable) with a note that they can be
  set by hand from here, or, by using the flight allocation tool.

Colin
www.sailwave.com


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.24/100 - Release Date: 13/09/2005

`

Hi.

Sorry if I messed up things with my suggestions…

Anyway, I agree with Ralph: We must try to go by ISAF terminology.

I agree with Colin: We must try to make the Human-Machine interface as understandable as possible.

KISS is a nice word…

Regards,

Martin

PS! Sorry I said We, when I ment Colin…

···

----- Original Message -----

From:
Colin Jenkins

To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 7:43 PM

Subject: RE: [sailwave] Flights

Hi Ralph,

“Is it as simple as that?” Yes. You can score a AddC event using Sailwave version 1.00 if you turn off race tie breaking and enter the results by hand - by hand meaning not using the sailno wiz (which will not know about multiple firsts etc) and using edit+result - i.e. double-clicking on a result cell and enter the multiple firsts etc by hand. You do of course have to manually work out who is in the next days flight assignments, but it can be done.

All the developments do is allow you to use the sailno wiz (because of the ‘allow multiple firsts etc across N starts’ check box) and do the flight rotations. Plus some other twiddly stuff (discards/tie-breaking) that is not really important.

On field names, it is complictatd by the fact that in the USA our fleets tend to be their divisions… Hence why I try (and fail) and not have fields for specific purposes…

You’ll hate this but one way out of the confusion is to cause more confusion and allow every field to have a race specific value… Not just flights and ratings - then you can use any field you like for AddC… and Sailwave truely become a generic tool. That nobody will understand but ‘mathematically’ it’ll be neat… :slight_smile:

Colin

www.sailwave.com

-----Original Message-----
From: sailwave@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sailwave@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Ralph Tingle
Sent: 14 September 2005 18:08
To:
sailwave@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [sailwave] Flights

Hi

Before we go any further, I would like to just consider terminology.
Since the very early days when someone asked Colin to score flights in an elimination series  (prize goes to Mark Townsend ;-))
we have used the term flights to describe what we have now.
Many of you will be aware that flights is also used in Team and Match racing, with different meanings (although there are many similarities)
I must admit, there are times when I have to stop & think & put my fleet racing head on instead of Match or Team racing & I can see the possibility of even further confusion/misunderstanding occurring when Sailwave gets outside our group of users eg International Race Officers writing SIs.
To try & determine some level of consistency, I had another look at AddC which says
  • The sailing instructions below provide for dividing a large fleet into smaller fleets for a series of qualifying races, the results of which determine each boat’s assignment to two or more fleets for the final series*
Logic therefore is to follow the lead of ISAF & not cause confusion with the team & match racers
NO! NO! NO! I hear you all calling, as we use the term fleet to mean something different - but do we??????
In the days when Mark sent in his request, fleet was a very important term as it enable groups of boats to be scored independently of other groups & was therefore a major scoring mechanism.
Now that we are nearing a new major public release with the fleet scoring tool long consigned to history, and replaced with separate start options, user defined scoring systems & multiple 1sts etc, perhaps now is the right time to think about terminology.
I believe that the right way to go is to follow the rules of our sport so what are the differences between fleet (as we knew it) and flight (as we now use it)?
Both are identities of groups of boats which may race in the same start or separate starts
Contrary to Team & Match Racing, the groups are always competing in the same race number, when they start just differs
Both need the facility for the groups to be scored separately at some point in the series
The new facilities which Colin has developed are really just allowing us to change the group which a boat sails in (I think!)
I agree with Martin that displaying the CURRENT group would be the icing on the cake as it would eliminate the hassle of populating a column for the finals so that they can be scored separately
IS IT REALLY AS SIMPLE AS THAT?????
If so, then we should think seriously about going back to the term 'Fleet' with 'Fleet' re-assignment & 'Fleet' seeding tools.
If it is a Traditional (instead of AddC) fleet racing series, the user just ignores the special tool (could it be called the AddC tool?)
PS Colin tends to use App LE to describe this type of racing but Appendix LE is mainly about large, complicated multi-class fleets, which is why I always tend to use AddC (Addendum C of Appendix LE) which deals specifically with this type of racing

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD??

I have written separately to Colin to identify that attempts to become more media friendly with Grand Finals etc, have not been totally successful & there could be changes the the system after ISAF conference in November.
If anyone hears of changes to AddC or whatever, please circulate it through SUG
My own view is that I believe there should be a type of racing with heats, semis & finals with all boats racing on the last day, but that's for another day ;-))

Regards

Ralph

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Bølgen [mailto:martin@seilforening.no]
Sent: 14 September 2005 12:39
To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [sailwave] FLights

HI!

  I do hope that what is clearyfied here, applies to all "Flights Users".
  After this, it looks to me that all flights kind of racing are basicly the same. Because of this, maybe Colin can make it easy to use!

Regards,

Martin

----- Original Message -----

From:
Colin Jenkins

To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:02 AM

Subject: [sailwave] FLights

` So the way you guys are thinking, in Sailwave a flight is always a
race-specific allocation; i.e. whenever you talk about a competitor’s
flight, there is always an implicit race associated with it (even if it’s
the same for all races).

    And when users run Topper Nationwide type events, they assign the same
    flight to all races.  I can then then remove the "default" flight field stop
    confusion.  It also stops confusion in start expressions.

Sounds OK to me if that’s what users want.

    I would probably add a tab to Edit+Competitor called "Flights" (plural) and
    give a list for race 1 to N (directly editable) with a note that they can be
    set by hand from here, or, by using the flight allocation tool.

Colin
www.sailwave.com


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.24/100 - Release Date: 13/09/2005

`

There you go again ‘race specific value’

I’ll just have to trust you & assume that you are right- whatever it means :wink:

Regards

Ralph

···

-----Original Message-----
From: Colin Jenkins [mailto:colin@sailwave.com]
Sent: 14 September 2005 18:44
To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [sailwave] Flights

Hi Ralph,

“Is it as simple as that?” Yes. You can score a AddC event using Sailwave version 1.00 if you turn off race tie breaking and enter the results by hand - by hand meaning not using the sailno wiz (which will not know about multiple firsts etc) and using edit+result - i.e. double-clicking on a result cell and enter the multiple firsts etc by hand. You do of course have to manually work out who is in the next days flight assignments, but it can be done.

All the developments do is allow you to use the sailno wiz (because of the ‘allow multiple firsts etc across N starts’ check box) and do the flight rotations. Plus some other twiddly stuff (discards/tie-breaking) that is not really important.

On field names, it is complictatd by the fact that in the USA our fleets tend to be their divisions… Hence why I try (and fail) and not have fields for specific purposes…

You’ll hate this but one way out of the confusion is to cause more confusion and allow every field to have a race specific value… Not just flights and ratings - then you can use any field you like for AddC… and Sailwave truely become a generic tool. That nobody will understand but ‘mathematically’ it’ll be neat… :slight_smile:

Colin

www.sailwave.com

-----Original Message-----
From: sailwave@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sailwave@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Ralph Tingle
Sent: 14 September 2005 18:08
To:
sailwave@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [sailwave] Flights

Hi

Before we go any further, I would like to just consider terminology.
Since the very early days when someone asked Colin to score flights in an elimination series  (prize goes to Mark Townsend ;-))
we have used the term flights to describe what we have now.
Many of you will be aware that flights is also used in Team and Match racing, with different meanings (although there are many similarities)
I must admit, there are times when I have to stop & think & put my fleet racing head on instead of Match or Team racing & I can see the possibility of even further confusion/misunderstanding occurring when Sailwave gets outside our group of users eg International Race Officers writing SIs.
To try & determine some level of consistency, I had another look at AddC which says
  • The sailing instructions below provide for dividing a large fleet into smaller fleets for a series of qualifying races, the results of which determine each boat’s assignment to two or more fleets for the final series*
Logic therefore is to follow the lead of ISAF & not cause confusion with the team & match racers
NO! NO! NO! I hear you all calling, as we use the term fleet to mean something different - but do we??????
In the days when Mark sent in his request, fleet was a very important term as it enable groups of boats to be scored independently of other groups & was therefore a major scoring mechanism.
Now that we are nearing a new major public release with the fleet scoring tool long consigned to history, and replaced with separate start options, user defined scoring systems & multiple 1sts etc, perhaps now is the right time to think about terminology.
I believe that the right way to go is to follow the rules of our sport so what are the differences between fleet (as we knew it) and flight (as we now use it)?
Both are identities of groups of boats which may race in the same start or separate starts
Contrary to Team & Match Racing, the groups are always competing in the same race number, when they start just differs
Both need the facility for the groups to be scored separately at some point in the series
The new facilities which Colin has developed are really just allowing us to change the group which a boat sails in (I think!)
I agree with Martin that displaying the CURRENT group would be the icing on the cake as it would eliminate the hassle of populating a column for the finals so that they can be scored separately
IS IT REALLY AS SIMPLE AS THAT?????
If so, then we should think seriously about going back to the term 'Fleet' with 'Fleet' re-assignment & 'Fleet' seeding tools.
If it is a Traditional (instead of AddC) fleet racing series, the user just ignores the special tool (could it be called the AddC tool?)
PS Colin tends to use App LE to describe this type of racing but Appendix LE is mainly about large, complicated multi-class fleets, which is why I always tend to use AddC (Addendum C of Appendix LE) which deals specifically with this type of racing

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD??

I have written separately to Colin to identify that attempts to become more media friendly with Grand Finals etc, have not been totally successful & there could be changes the the system after ISAF conference in November.
If anyone hears of changes to AddC or whatever, please circulate it through SUG
My own view is that I believe there should be a type of racing with heats, semis & finals with all boats racing on the last day, but that's for another day ;-))

Regards

Ralph

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Bølgen [mailto:martin@seilforening.no]
Sent: 14 September 2005 12:39
To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [sailwave] FLights

HI!

  I do hope that what is clearyfied here, applies to all "Flights Users".
  After this, it looks to me that all flights kind of racing are basicly the same. Because of this, maybe Colin can make it easy to use!

Regards,

Martin

----- Original Message -----

From:
Colin Jenkins

To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 11:02 AM

Subject: [sailwave] FLights

` So the way you guys are thinking, in Sailwave a flight is always a
race-specific allocation; i.e. whenever you talk about a competitor’s
flight, there is always an implicit race associated with it (even if it’s
the same for all races).

    And when users run Topper Nationwide type events, they assign the same
    flight to all races.  I can then then remove the "default" flight field stop
    confusion.  It also stops confusion in start expressions.

Sounds OK to me if that’s what users want.

    I would probably add a tab to Edit+Competitor called "Flights" (plural) and
    give a list for race 1 to N (directly editable) with a note that they can be
    set by hand from here, or, by using the flight allocation tool.

Colin
www.sailwave.com


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.24/100 - Release Date: 13/09/2005

`

Hi Ralph,

There you go again 'race specific value'

I'll just have to trust you & assume that you are right- whatever it means
;-)<<

??

If you do a flight assignments to race 1, race 2... and then view 'race
flights', you'll see what I mean. To score an AddC series you need a field
that has a race-specific values (we've been calling them flights); but just
Blue, but blue in race 1 and green in race 2 and... i.e. race-specific
values.

Or not. Perhaps I'm wrong and you can do it without race-specific value -
but I don't see how. (Other than locking down reviously scored races such
that they are ignored when a series is scored - but this can lead to
problems if you have to go back and fix a flight assignment for example.)

Colin
www.sailwave.com

···

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.25/102 - Release Date: 14/09/2005

Hi!

I’ve been wondering: Ain’t all we do “Race specific” ?

After being confused for a while, I see that race specific is (the) solution. One big problem is to make all info visible, and I think Colins suggestion for the flight coloumn is a big step forward!

So, what is race specific?

The start is Race specific.

The position which gives you a score is Race specific.

Your score is Race specific,

And if you add all the Race specific scores, you’ll get an overall sum

which you subtract the worst Specific race; and you’ll get’s your final stand.

Your Flight assignment is Race specific…

and so on.

BTW: Wasn’t it Ralph who said that the flight assignment had to be Race specific, in the beginning.

Regards,

Martin ( Still confused, but probably a little less…)

···

----- Original Message -----

From:
Colin Jenkins

To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 8:32 PM

Subject: RE: [sailwave] Flights

`Hi Ralph,

There you go again ‘race specific value’
I’ll just have to trust you & assume that you are right- whatever it means
;-)<<

??

If you do a flight assignments to race 1, race 2… and then view ‘race
flights’, you’ll see what I mean. To score an AddC series you need a field
that has a race-specific values (we’ve been calling them flights); but just
Blue, but blue in race 1 and green in race 2 and… i.e. race-specific
values.

Or not. Perhaps I’m wrong and you can do it without race-specific value -
but I don’t see how. (Other than locking down reviously scored races such
that they are ignored when a series is scored - but this can lead to
problems if you have to go back and fix a flight assignment for example.)

Colin
www.sailwave.com


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.25/102 - Release Date: 14/09/2005

`