At our local sailing club there are two phantoms. They are literally
unbeatable in a handicap race. Many people believe it is the handicap
the phantom has.
Has anyone changed the handicap for there results and if so by how
much have they been changed.
I think the main reason is that the phantom is advancing in equipment
much faster than the handicap itself. The main suspect is probably the
invent of carbon masts which have changed the rig flex for the better.
At our local sailing club there are two phantoms. They are literally
unbeatable in a handicap race. Many people believe it is the handicap
the phantom has.
Has anyone changed the handicap for there results and if so by how
much have they been changed.
I think the main reason is that the phantom is advancing in equipment
much faster than the handicap itself. The main suspect is probably the
invent of carbon masts which have changed the rig flex for the better.
The good results may also be due to the people who are sailing the boats. We had this problem when I was sailing Snipes in and around Paris. In any handicap race the Snipes inevitably took the first few places. There was much muttering about favourable handicaps.
We were anxious to point out that, as a fleet, we organised training sessions throughout the year, did a lot of competitive racing, and frequently competed in open and international events, had invested in new sails and had prepared our boats, got fit to sail rather than sailing to get fit… and that we were merely sailing to our handicap. We weren’t popular with those who never trained, rarely competed and were using very tired sails…
At our local sailing club there are two phantoms. They are literally
unbeatable in a handicap race. Many people believe it is the handicap
the phantom has.
Has anyone changed the handicap for there results and if so by how
much have they been changed.
I think the main reason is that the phantom is advancing in equipment
much faster than the handicap itself. The main suspect is probably the
invent of carbon masts which have changed the rig flex for the better.
The Phantom wins most of the handicap events at my local club & even beats 3 digit PYs on the water, but then the helm also happens to be probably the best sailor at the club!
To determine the correct local PY, a ‘crew skill factor’ has to be deducted first.
This is the problem with the process, unless clubs have a Personal Handicap system.
But at the end of the day, a sensible estimate by fair minded individuals is better than not doing anything at all
The good results may also be due to the people who are sailing the boats. We had this problem when I was sailing Snipes in and around Paris. In any handicap race the Snipes inevitably took the first few places. There was much muttering about favourable handicaps.
We were anxious to point out that, as a fleet, we organised training sessions throughout the year, did a lot of competitive racing, and frequently competed in open and international events, had invested in new sails and had prepared our boats, got fit to sail rather than sailing to get fit… and that we were merely sailing to our handicap. We weren’t popular with those who never trained, rarely competed and were using very tired sails…
At our local sailing club there are two phantoms. They are literally
unbeatable in a handicap race. Many people believe it is the handicap
the phantom has.
Has anyone changed the handicap for there results and if so by how
much have they been changed.
I think the main reason is that the phantom is advancing in equipment
much faster than the handicap itself. The main suspect is probably the
invent of carbon masts which have changed the rig flex for the better.