just checking beta version 2.28.0
Using aliasing
When I publish the race data, the NHC fleets show PHRFTOT & PHRF in the summary rather than NHC for the aliased fleets when using Publish_V2.
In Publish they show PHRFTOT and LowPoint
In the standard version the NHC fleets show NHC1 & PHRF
Hi Kirk,
Looking at your files the say that it is scored as NHC for Fleet = 4 but there are no competitors that are in Fleet 4 as far as I can see.
ResultsV2 only affects the header - Specifically, the images are resized to be equal size so that you get a balanced heading. It doesn’t affect the column headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
There are 4 divisions (fleets), two are PHRF, 2 are aliased NHC. (see the published results below)
The result headers don’t reflect this (the numbers are good).
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Looking at your files the say that it is scored as NHC for Fleet = 4 but there are no competitors that are in Fleet 4 as far as I can see.
ResultsV2 only affects the header - Specifically, the images are resized to be equal size so that you get a balanced heading. It doesn’t affect the column headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
just checking beta version 2.28.0
Using aliasing
When I publish the race data, the NHC fleets show PHRFTOT & PHRF in the summary rather than NHC for the aliased fleets when using Publish_V2.
In Publish they show PHRFTOT and LowPoint
In the standard version the NHC fleets show NHC1 & PHRF
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets this has always been the case.
You can’t use Divisions to decided if it is NHC or not
Jon
Jon Eskdale
07530 112233
Skype “eskdale”
Ok, I see what you mean.
I was experimenting with aliasing last fall and thought I got it right ( it looked ok; but looks can be deceiving!).
will get back to you when I correct my mistakes.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:34 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets this has always been the case.
You can’t use Divisions to decided if it is NHC or not
Jon
Jon Eskdale
07530 112233
Skype “eskdale”
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 15:28, Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
There are 4 divisions (fleets), two are PHRF, 2 are aliased NHC. (see the published results below)
The result headers don’t reflect this (the numbers are good).
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Looking at your files the say that it is scored as NHC for Fleet = 4 but there are no competitors that are in Fleet 4 as far as I can see.
ResultsV2 only affects the header - Specifically, the images are resized to be equal size so that you get a balanced heading. It doesn’t affect the column headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com [sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups…com> wrote:
just checking beta version 2.28.0
Using aliasing
When I publish the race data, the NHC fleets show PHRFTOT & PHRF in the summary rather than NHC for the aliased fleets when using Publish_V2.
In Publish they show PHRFTOT and LowPoint
In the standard version the NHC fleets show NHC1 & PHRF
Hi Kirk,
Having started off scoring dinghy events and no doing some big
boat events, I have come to the opinion that Fleet in dinghy event
means same as Division in big boat. In a dinghy event division is
used for labelling a set of boats for a valid reason, typically to
distinguish between men & women, age group.
So if you use the Fleet column in Sailwave and rename it to
Dic=vision you will get I think what you want whilst still
maintainingdivision for your competitors to see 
Kind regards,
Huw
On 10/03/2019 15:34, Jon Eskdale
[sailwave] wrote:
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets this has always been thecase.
You can't use Divisions to decided if it is NHC ornot
Jon
Jon Eskdale
07530 112233
Skype “eskdale”
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at15:28, Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
There are 4 divisions (fleets),two are PHRF, 2 are aliased NHC. (see the
published results below)
The result headers don't reflect this(the numbers are good).
On Sun, Mar10, 2019 at 11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Looking at your files the saythat it is scored as NHC for
Fleet = 4 but there are no
competitors that are in Fleet 4
as far as I can see.
ResultsV2 only affects theheader - Specifically, the
images are resized to be equal
size so that you get a balanced
heading. It doesn’t affect
the column headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333443377
07530112233
OnSun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups…com >
wrote:
just checkingbeta version 2.28.0
Using aliasing
When I publish therace data, the NHC
fleets show PHRFTOT
& PHRF in the
summary rather than
NHC for the aliased
fleets when using
Publish_V2.
In Publish they showPHRFTOT and LowPoint
In the standardversion the NHC fleets
show NHC1 & PHRF
Virus-free. www.avast.com
Yes, the words fleet & Division get a lot of interpretations ( and you don’t often find agreement with more one person on what they “should” mean).
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:41 AM Huw Pearce huw.pearce@bcs.org.uk [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Having started off scoring dinghy events and no doing some bigboat events, I have come to the opinion that Fleet in dinghy event
means same as Division in big boat. In a dinghy event division is
used for labelling a set of boats for a valid reason, typically to
distinguish between men & women, age group.
So if you use the Fleet column in Sailwave and rename it toDic=vision you will get I think what you want whilst still
maintainingdivision for your competitors to see
Kind regards,
Huw
On 10/03/2019 15:34, Jon Eskdale > jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] wrote:
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets this has always been thecase.
You can't use Divisions to decided if it is NHC ornot
Jon
Jon Eskdale
07530 112233
Skype “eskdale”
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at > > 15:28, Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com > > [sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com > > > wrote:
There are 4 divisions (fleets),two are PHRF, 2 are aliased NHC. (see the
published results below)
The result headers don't reflect this(the numbers are good).
On Sun, Mar > > > 10, 2019 at 11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com > > > [sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com > > > > wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Looking at your files the saythat it is scored as NHC for
Fleet = 4 but there are no
competitors that are in Fleet 4
as far as I can see.
ResultsV2 only affects theheader - Specifically, the
images are resized to be equal
size so that you get a balanced
heading. It doesn’t affect
the column headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333443377
07530112233
OnSun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups…com >
wrote:
just checkingbeta version 2.28.0
Using aliasing
When I publish therace data, the NHC
fleets show PHRFTOT
& PHRF in the
summary rather than
NHC for the aliased
fleets when using
Publish_V2.
In Publish they showPHRFTOT and LowPoint
In the standardversion the NHC fleets
show NHC1 & PHRF
Virus-free. www.avast.com
picked the wrong version of file (f&%$). It seems to be all ok when using just fleets.
We do have fleets sub-divided into divisions and the bad blw file (now deleted) must have been an exercise in dual scoring them.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:36 AM Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I see what you mean.
I was experimenting with aliasing last fall and thought I got it right ( it looked ok; but looks can be deceiving!).
will get back to you when I correct my mistakes.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:34 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets this has always been the case.
You can’t use Divisions to decided if it is NHC or not
Jon
Jon Eskdale
07530 112233
Skype “eskdale”
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 15:28, Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
There are 4 divisions (fleets), two are PHRF, 2 are aliased NHC. (see the published results below)
The result headers don’t reflect this (the numbers are good).
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Looking at your files the say that it is scored as NHC for Fleet = 4 but there are no competitors that are in Fleet 4 as far as I can see.
ResultsV2 only affects the header - Specifically, the images are resized to be equal size so that you get a balanced heading. It doesn’t affect the column headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com [sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups…com> wrote:
just checking beta version 2.28.0
Using aliasing
When I publish the race data, the NHC fleets show PHRFTOT & PHRF in the summary rather than NHC for the aliased fleets when using Publish_V2.
In Publish they show PHRFTOT and LowPoint
In the standard version the NHC fleets show NHC1 & PHRF
ok, if you just use fleets things work fairly well.
One item (in both versions)
When I score using aliasing, I see the following popup.
it always seems to be the 2nd competitor in the 1st aliased race, but???
The results seem good as is publishing. any idea what I am missing?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:57 AM Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com wrote:
picked the wrong version of file (f&%$). It seems to be all ok when using just fleets.
We do have fleets sub-divided into divisions and the bad blw file (now deleted) must have been an exercise in dual scoring them.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:36 AM Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I see what you mean.
I was experimenting with aliasing last fall and thought I got it right ( it looked ok; but looks can be deceiving!).
will get back to you when I correct my mistakes.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:34 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets this has always been the case.
You can’t use Divisions to decided if it is NHC or not
Jon
Jon Eskdale
07530 112233
Skype “eskdale”
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 15:28, Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
There are 4 divisions (fleets), two are PHRF, 2 are aliased NHC. (see the published results below)
The result headers don’t reflect this (the numbers are good).
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Looking at your files the say that it is scored as NHC for Fleet = 4 but there are no competitors that are in Fleet 4 as far as I can see.
ResultsV2 only affects the header - Specifically, the images are resized to be equal size so that you get a balanced heading. It doesn’t affect the column headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com [sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups…com> wrote:
just checking beta version 2.28.0
Using aliasing
When I publish the race data, the NHC fleets show PHRFTOT & PHRF in the summary rather than NHC for the aliased fleets when using Publish_V2.
In Publish they show PHRFTOT and LowPoint
In the standard version the NHC fleets show NHC1 & PHRF
Hi Kirk,
Did you mean to attach the Sailwave.BLW file? If not perhaps you
could do so with the one that generated the HTM you did attach.
Kind regards,
Huw
On 10/03/2019 17:52, Kirk Robertson
[sailwave] wrote:
ok, if you just use fleets things work fairlywell.
One item (in both versions)
When I score using aliasing, I see the followingpopup.
it always seems to be the 2nd competitor in the 1staliased race, but???
The results seem good as is publishing. any ideawhat I am missing?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at11:57 AM Kirk Robertson <jkirkrobertson@gmail.com >
wrote:
picked the wrong version of file(f&%$). It seems to be all ok when using just
fleets.
We do have fleets sub-divided into divisions andthe bad blw file (now deleted) must have been an
exercise in dual scoring them.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019at 11:36 AM Kirk Robertson <jkirkrobertson@gmail.com >
wrote:
Ok, I see what you mean.
I was experimenting with aliasing last falland thought I got it right ( it looked ok; but
looks can be deceiving!).
will get back to you when I correct mymistakes.
On Sun, Mar 10,2019 at 11:34 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets thishas always been the case.
You can't use Divisions todecided if it is NHC or not
Jon
Jon Eskdale
07530 112233
Skype “eskdale”
OnSun, 10 Mar 2019 at 15:28, Kirk
Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
There are 4divisions (fleets), two
are PHRF, 2 are aliased
NHC. (see the published
results below)
The result headersdon’t reflect this (the
numbers are good).
OnSun, Mar 10, 2019 at
11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
HiKirk,
Lookingat your files
the say that
it is scored
as NHC for
Fleet = 4 but
there are no
competitors
that are in
Fleet 4 as far
as I can see.
ResultsV2only affects
the header -
Specifically,
the images are
resized to be
equal size so
that you get a
balanced
heading. It
doesn’t affect
the column
headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333443377
07530112233
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com
[sailwave]
<sailwave@yahoogroups…com >
wrote:
justchecking beta
version 2.28.0
Usingaliasing
When Ipublish the
race data, the
NHC fleets
show PHRFTOT
& PHRF in
the summary
rather than
NHC for the
aliased fleets
when using
Publish_V2.
In Publishthey show
PHRFTOT and
LowPoint
In thestandard
version the
NHC fleets
show NHC1
& PHRF
Virus-free. www.avast.com
yes, here is blw file
(eyes, even with glasses not what they used to be)
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 2:28 PM Huw Pearce huw.pearce@bcs.org.uk [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Did you mean to attach the Sailwave.BLW file? If not perhaps youcould do so with the one that generated the HTM you did attach.
Kind regards,
Huw
On 10/03/2019 17:52, Kirk Robertson > jkirkrobertson@gmail.com [sailwave] wrote:
ok, if you just use fleets things work fairlywell.
One item (in both versions)
When I score using aliasing, I see the followingpopup.
it always seems to be the 2nd competitor in the 1staliased race, but???
The results seem good as is publishing. any ideawhat I am missing?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at > > 11:57 AM Kirk Robertson <jkirkrobertson@gmail.com > > > wrote:
picked the wrong version of file(f&%$). It seems to be all ok when using just
fleets.
We do have fleets sub-divided into divisions andthe bad blw file (now deleted) must have been an
exercise in dual scoring them.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 > > > at 11:36 AM Kirk Robertson <jkirkrobertson@gmail.com > > > > wrote:
Ok, I see what you mean.
I was experimenting with aliasing last falland thought I got it right ( it looked ok; but
looks can be deceiving!).
will get back to you when I correct mymistakes.
On Sun, Mar 10, > > > > 2019 at 11:34 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com > > > > [sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com > > > > > wrote:
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets thishas always been the case.
You can't use Divisions todecided if it is NHC or not
Jon
Jon Eskdale
07530 112233
Skype “eskdale”
OnSun, 10 Mar 2019 at 15:28, Kirk
Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
There are 4divisions (fleets), two
are PHRF, 2 are aliased
NHC. (see the published
results below)
The result headersdon’t reflect this (the
numbers are good).
OnSun, Mar 10, 2019 at
11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
HiKirk,
Lookingat your files
the say that
it is scored
as NHC for
Fleet = 4 but
there are no
competitors
that are in
Fleet 4 as far
as I can see.
ResultsV2only affects
the header -
Specifically,
the images are
resized to be
equal size so
that you get a
balanced
heading. It
doesn’t affect
the column
headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333443377
07530112233
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com > > > > > > > [sailwave] > > > > > > > <sailwave@yahoogroups…com > > > > > > > > wrote:
justchecking beta
version 2.28.0
Usingaliasing
When Ipublish the
race data, the
NHC fleets
show PHRFTOT
& PHRF in
the summary
rather than
NHC for the
aliased fleets
when using
Publish_V2.
In Publishthey show
PHRFTOT and
LowPoint
In thestandard
version the
NHC fleets
show NHC1
& PHRF
Virus-free. www.avast.com
Hi Kirk,
The problem is you have 4 fleets but there are only starts for 2 fleets in the races
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
but if you add starts for the aliased races; then you get
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
The problem is you have 4 fleets but there are only starts for 2 fleets in the races
Jon
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 18:47, Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
yes, here is blw file
(eyes, even with glasses not what they used to be)
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 2:28 PM Huw Pearce huw.pearce@bcs.org.uk [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Did you mean to attach the Sailwave.BLW file? If not perhaps youcould do so with the one that generated the HTM you did attach.
Kind regards,
Huw
On 10/03/2019 17:52, Kirk Robertson > > > jkirkrobertson@gmail..com [sailwave] wrote:
ok, if you just use fleets things work fairlywell.
One item (in both versions)
When I score using aliasing, I see the followingpopup.
it always seems to be the 2nd competitor in the 1staliased race, but???
The results seem good as is publishing. any ideawhat I am missing?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at > > > > 11:57 AM Kirk Robertson <jkirkrobertson@gmail.com > > > > > wrote:
picked the wrong version of file(f&%$). It seems to be all ok when using just
fleets.
We do have fleets sub-divided into divisions andthe bad blw file (now deleted) must have been an
exercise in dual scoring them.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 > > > > > at 11:36 AM Kirk Robertson <jkirkrobertson@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote:
Ok, I see what you mean.
I was experimenting with aliasing last falland thought I got it right ( it looked ok; but
looks can be deceiving!).
will get back to you when I correct mymistakes.
On Sun, Mar 10, > > > > > > 2019 at 11:34 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com > > > > > > [sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > wrote:
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets thishas always been the case.
You can't use Divisions todecided if it is NHC or not
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
OnSun, 10 Mar 2019 at 15:28, Kirk
Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
There are 4divisions (fleets), two
are PHRF, 2 are aliased
NHC. (see the published
results below)
The result headersdon’t reflect this (the
numbers are good).
OnSun, Mar 10, 2019 at
11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
HiKirk,
Lookingat your files
the say that
it is scored
as NHC for
Fleet = 4 but
there are no
competitors
that are in
Fleet 4 as far
as I can see.
ResultsV2only affects
the header -
Specifically,
the images are
resized to be
equal size so
that you get a
balanced
heading. It
doesn’t affect
the column
headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333443377
07530112233
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > [sailwave] > > > > > > > > > <sailwave@yahoogroups…com > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
justchecking beta
version 2.28.0
Usingaliasing
When Ipublish the
race data, the
NHC fleets
show PHRFTOT
& PHRF in
the summary
rather than
NHC for the
aliased fleets
when using
Publish_V2.
In Publishthey show
PHRFTOT and
LowPoint
In thestandard
version the
NHC fleets
show NHC1
& PHRF
Virus-free. www.avast.com
Hi Kirk,
I don’t get that error message
See attached file
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
ok, think I got it.
add starts for each aliased fleet, select the aliased fleet for that start, and copy starts for races (including the extra race) and all the errors go away.
Fn 5 is a magic button. When I displayed starts it was obvious what the problem was.
I have written it up; right now a little “notey”, so after I do it for few more existing series; I might actually know how it works generate a better document
Thank you again!
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 3:51 PM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
I don’t get that error message
See attached file
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 19:23, Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
but if you add starts for the aliased races; then you get
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave…com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
The problem is you have 4 fleets but there are only starts for 2 fleets in the races
Jon
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 18:47, Kirk Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
yes, here is blw file
(eyes, even with glasses not what they used to be)
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 2:28 PM Huw Pearce huw.pearce@bcs.org.uk [sailwave] sailwave@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi Kirk,
Did you mean to attach the Sailwave.BLW file? If not perhaps youcould do so with the one that generated the HTM you did attach.
Kind regards,
Huw
On 10/03/2019 17:52, Kirk Robertson > > > > > jkirkrobertson@gmail..com [sailwave] wrote:
ok, if you just use fleets things work fairlywell.
One item (in both versions)
When I score using aliasing, I see the followingpopup.
it always seems to be the 2nd competitor in the 1staliased race, but???
The results seem good as is publishing. any ideawhat I am missing?
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at > > > > > > 11:57 AM Kirk Robertson <jkirkrobertson@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote:
picked the wrong version of file(f&%$). It seems to be all ok when using just
fleets.
We do have fleets sub-divided into divisions andthe bad blw file (now deleted) must have been an
exercise in dual scoring them.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 > > > > > > > at 11:36 AM Kirk Robertson <jkirkrobertson@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote:
Ok, I see what you mean.
I was experimenting with aliasing last falland thought I got it right ( it looked ok; but
looks can be deceiving!).
will get back to you when I correct mymistakes.
On Sun, Mar 10, > > > > > > > > 2019 at 11:34 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com > > > > > > > > [sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > wrote:
Hi Kirk,
NHC only works with Fleets thishas always been the case.
You can't use Divisions todecided if it is NHC or not
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333 443377
07530 112233
OnSun, 10 Mar 2019 at 15:28, Kirk
Robertson jkirkrobertson@gmail.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
There are 4divisions (fleets), two
are PHRF, 2 are aliased
NHC. (see the published
results below)
The result headersdon’t reflect this (the
numbers are good).
OnSun, Mar 10, 2019 at
11:19 AM Jon Eskdale jon@sailwave.com
[sailwave] <sailwave@yahoogroups.com >
wrote:
HiKirk,
Lookingat your files
the say that
it is scored
as NHC for
Fleet = 4 but
there are no
competitors
that are in
Fleet 4 as far
as I can see.
ResultsV2only affects
the header -
Specifically,
the images are
resized to be
equal size so
that you get a
balanced
heading. It
doesn’t affect
the column
headers
Jon
Jon Eskdale
03333443377
07530112233
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 14:58, kirkrobertson406@yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > [sailwave] > > > > > > > > > > > <sailwave@yahoogroups…com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
justchecking beta
version 2.28.0
Usingaliasing
When Ipublish the
race data, the
NHC fleets
show PHRFTOT
& PHRF in
the summary
rather than
NHC for the
aliased fleets
when using
Publish_V2.
In Publishthey show
PHRFTOT and
LowPoint
In thestandard
version the
NHC fleets
show NHC1
& PHRF
Virus-free. www.avast.com