[sailwave] DNF and sailing the course

You always need to be very careful scoring a competitor that crosses the finish line anything other than the place they finished in. Unless you watch the competitor sail the entire course you can not be sure you are correct about them missing a mark. The best approach is to tell the competitor that you didn't feel they sailed the correct course and explain why. In most cases the competitor will choose to retire and your problem is solved.

Mark Townsend
s_mark_townsend@hotmail.com

···

From: "Cliff Buffham" <cliff_buffham@ntlworld.com>
Reply-To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com
To: <sailwave@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [sailwave] DNF and sailing the course
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:36:35 -0000

Colin,

This question and Ralph Tingle's reply are very interesting.

Rule A5 states "A boat that did not start, comply with rule 30.2 or 30.3, or
finish, or that takes a penalty under rule 44.3 or retires after finishing
shall be scored accordingly by the race committee without a hearing".

So we have to look at the definitions.

The definition of "finish" is concerned with crossing the line from the
direction of the last mark, taking penalties after hitting marks on the
course or the finish line, and sailing the correct course.

Therefore A5 appears to me to give specific powers to the race committee to
award a DNF without any limitation as to the reason for the boat qualifying
as a DNF, if the committee is aware rule contraventions covered by A5.
Clearly if the committee is unaware of an incident such as a windward mark
hitting then it cannot use those powers and it would be up to others to
protest, but if it is aware then it should. Note that rule A5 states "SHALL
be scored accordingly" so the race officer is compelled to act.

So, I would contend that rule A5 gives licence to, and compels, the race
committee (in the person of the race officer) to award DNC, DNS, OCS, ZFP,
BFD, SCP, DNF and RAF (assuming a retirement is signalled by the boat)
without a hearing. It cannot do this for other scores (ie DSQ, DNE) and
would then have to protest under rule 60.2.

It would be sensible to note a time for the boat anyway just in case there
is a request for redress.

Rule 60.2 does not appear to use the crucial words "cannot" or "must"
anywhere, and seems to me to allow the race committee to initiate a protest
when its powers under A5 are insufficient.

So where does my logic fall down?

Regards,

Cliff

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Sailwave <colin@sailwave.com> [mailto:colin@sailwave.com]
  Sent: 13 December 2002 22:51
  To: sailwave@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [sailwave] DNF and sailing the course

  As I understand it, if a boat does not sail the correct course (say
  she skips a mark), the OOD cannot (under the RRS) unilaterally score
  the competitor as DNF; they or another competitor has to protest if
  the offender does not retire, otherwise there is nothing anybody can
  do about it. This is because of the definition of "finishing" in
  that a boat can "finish" without sailing the correct course and the
  OOD have no 'special powers'. However in club racing it's convenient
  and practical in a way for the OOD/scorer to enter DNF. There again,
  looking at club racing as practice for bigger events (which is how I
  view it), perhaps we shouldn't... Anybody have any thoughts about
  this? The RYA/USSA guidelines to Appendix A specifically mention
  that the OOD cannot so which is interesting... We seem to have an
  unwritten philosophy in our club that 'it is not cool to protest'
  which is not going to get any of us to learn the rules or be prepared
  for a 'real' protest hearing. I've been to a protest hearing at a
  Europeans and it was a fairly intimidating. I view protesting as
  simply a part of sailing; I could happily get drunk with somebody
  that protested me without feeling resentment... But going full
  circle, a protest meeting at our club involves folk giving their
  evenings up, so perhaps in this case, which is relatively minor, we
  are 'correct' in scoring them as DNF and simply giving them a bit of
  stick in the bar...

  Regards,
  Colin J
  www.sailwave.com

  -!- eliminate spam once and for all http://www.giantcompany.com/ -!-

  http://www.sailwave.com/

  Convert to daily digest of emails send blank email to:
  sailwave-digest@yahoogroups.com
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  sailwave-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.427 / Virus Database: 240 - Release Date: 06/12/02

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

Hi Mark,

You always need to be very careful scoring a competitor that crosses the

finish line anything other than the place they finished in. Unless you watch
the competitor sail the entire course you can not be sure you are correct
about them missing a mark. The best approach is to tell the competitor that
you didn't feel they sailed the correct course and explain why. In most
cases the competitor will choose to retire and your problem is solved.<

I think that's why the guidelines to Appendix A specifically mentions that
the RO cannot score a boat DNF if they see her miss a mark. Presumably what
could easily happen is that the boat realises their mistake and corrects
while the RO is busy on something else resulting in confusion and much
finger pointing at the end of the day.

Regards,
Colin
www.sailwave.com

···

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.431 / Virus Database: 242 - Release Date: 17/12/2002

the RO cannot score a boat DNF if they see her miss a mark.
Presumably what
could easily happen is that the boat realises their mistake and
corrects
while the RO is busy on something else resulting in confusion and
much
finger pointing at the end of the day.

Colin, friends,

Occasionally, committee boats are posted at important marks along the
course (especially in long distance races), specifically to note
competitors passing the mark on the wrong side.
In order for the list of "trespassers" to be processed quickly, we
regularly add this statement to the Sailing Instructions (e.g. the
2002 Round Texel Race):

"1.3. In addition to the exceptions of RRS 63.1, disqualification
        without a hearing by the race committee will apply to:
· sailing an incorrect course (SI 10.2);
· [other automatic disqualifications]"

This SI addition was added in co-operation with an International
Judge.
When the lists return from the committee boats, the sailnumbers are
copied onto a special form which is signed by the Principle Race
Officer and posted on the notice board (all within the allotted time
limits) and sailors are automatically disqualified / scored DSQ - not
DNF.
Sailors can always request a hearing (within the allotted time limit)
and, when successfull, have their original position reinstated.

This method does away with a lot of unneccessary protests from the
Race Committee, saving time and energy.

It turns out most successfull boat-to-boat protests concerning
sailing the course incorrectly, end up in a score of DSQ (on grounds
of RRS28.1) anyway, not DNF.

Best regards,

Jeroen J.A. Tirion
Regatta Service Europe