Thanks for your advice guys, manually changed the PYs and applied them to our club’s combined summer series.
Overall the changes have been smaller than I imagined except at the top of the fleet where the Lasers where the obvious beneficiaries.
The sailjuice results are attached, if anyone is interested, and the standard PY results to compare with are at…
http://www.burghfieldsailing.org/content/results/show.php?page=2011_sun_com_su_pm.htm
cheeers… Simon
2011_sun_com_su_pm_SJ2.html (40.3 KB)
Glad you got it sorter, but crikey! Have just looked at the published handicaps - clearly produced by a Laser sailor 
(I know it’s on flat water, but even so…).
<hobby_horse> Why change the handicap of the most widely sailed boat in the UK (and world, probably) other than it saves changing lots of the other classes?</hobby_horse>
Mike
Lancing SC
— In sailwave@yahoogroups.com, “Simon L. Smith” <SimonLSmith@…> wrote:
Overall the changes have been smaller than I imagined except at the top of
the fleet where the Lasers where the obvious beneficiaries.
Mike, that was exactly our view, so we amended that (Laser) to 1100, then looked at the disappointing relative performance of the RS400 and 200, so amended those to 970 and 1070
Attached is the adjusted results sheet that can be compared to http://www.burghfieldsailing.org/content/results/show.php?page=2011_sun_com_su_pm.htm
Feel that these are a better results which better reflect individual fleet performances
Simon
2011_sun_com_su_pm_SJ_RS4002.htm (44.6 KB)
On 8 December 2011 18:08, Mike mike.croker@phonecoop.coop wrote:
— In sailwave@yahoogroups.com, “Simon L. Smith” <SimonLSmith@…> wrote:
Overall the changes have been smaller than I imagined except at the top of
the fleet where the Lasers where the obvious beneficiaries.
Glad you got it sorter, but crikey! Have just looked at the published handicaps - clearly produced by a Laser sailor
<hobby_horse> Why change the handicap of the most widely sailed boat in the UK (and world, probably) other than it saves changing lots of the other classes?</hobby_horse>
Mike
Lancing SC
Hasn’t that hurt the Toppers and the Fevas?
Rgds
George Morris
----- Original Message -----
From:
Simon L. Smith
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [sailwave] Re: Comparing Ratings Files
Mike, that was exactly our view, so we amended that (Laser) to 1100, then looked at the disappointing relative performance of the RS400 and 200, so amended those to 970 and 1070
Attached is the adjusted results sheet that can be compared to http://www.burghfieldsailing.org/content/results/show.php?page=2011_sun_com_su_pm.htm
Feel that these are a better results which better reflect individual fleet performances
Simon
On 8 December 2011 18:08, Mike mike.croker@phonecoop.coop wrote:
— In sailwave@yahoogroups.com , “Simon L. Smith” <SimonLSmith@…> wrote:
> Overall the changes have been smaller than I imagined except at the top of > the fleet where the Lasers where the obvious beneficiaries.
Glad you got it sorter, but crikey! Have just looked at the published handicaps - clearly produced by a Laser sailor
<hobby_horse> Why change the handicap of the most widely sailed boat in the UK (and world, probably) other than it saves changing lots of the other classes?</hobby_horse>
Mike
Lancing SC
That was kind of my point (not to mention Laser 2, and any other boat that doesn’t do too well on flat water) - does anyone know where the SailJuice handicaps originated?
Mike
Lancing
— In sailwave@yahoogroups.com, “George Morris” <gmorris@…> wrote:
Hasn’t that hurt the Toppers and the Fevas?